Love and freedom

ANSWER OF TAYANA Do not try to limit love with frameworks of narrow conclusions. Often definitions which are given by people have nothing in common with it. You can devote all life to careful studying of this question in the theory, with the subsequent writing of great scientific works, but all this will be only an expanded article from an explanatory dictionary. You will never be read, as you speak abstractly. Concerning love it will be lie. And you will be exposed, because you have no personal experience of experience of this energy. When philosophy says a monologue about love, it speaks about an inanimate object. There is no life in such doubtful reasoning. Everything that has the form and name is mortal. And love turns to a dead category. Therefore, despite of any sorts of pleasure with which people try to surround and console themselves, they are in constant alarm and melancholy from presentiment that there is something wrong.

Absence of good is and the absence of love. Jesus’ aspiration to teach people to live with love and in love, unfortunately, still did not have any success. The only thing, than they can brag is the arrogance. It confuses the person concerning his greatness and mission. It makes him think, that he has the right to solve global world problems ostensibly with the purpose of peaceableness and mercy to mankind and imposes fixed ideas to the whole states, without any responsibility. So it happened in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, in Georgia and in the Ukraine.

When the small inhabitant associate himself with the Highest Spirit there can be probably gradual transformation of this person into a ghost. In conditions of “optimization of invariance” the reality can be in such a way.

Your “aspirations” will not have any result. At a casual meeting with me you can feel a special condition in spite of the fact that I did not aspire to you. But from your side it will not be the same because love is not a mechanical subject and any desire ” to form connections ” will not help. The love resembles a stream of the river which in its current embraces and envelops any subject which is on its way. Certainly, speed and force of this stream depends on its source. The mountain river or the sun can be an example. But this stream can give life and bring death. Presence of reason is the main condition of display of love in the world of people.

Once the Wind met a beautiful Flower and fell in love with it. While it gently caressed the Flower, it answered it with the even greater love expressed in colour and aroma.
But it seemed to the Wind not enough and it decided: ” If I give the Flower all power and force it will give me something greater “. And it breathed on the Flower with powerful breath of its love.
The flower did not bear such rough passion and broke.
The wind tried to lift it and to recover, but could not. Then it ceased and began to breathe on the Flower with gentle breath of love, but it withered before its eyes. The Wind cried then:
– I gave you all power of my love, and you broke! It seems that you did not have power to love me so you did not love me!
But the Flower answered nothing. It died.

Love appears in the world of people in one of such versions more often. The real act of nature. In the given example there is “an aspiration to formation of connections “, but it can hardly be named love. And about ” harmonious addition ” to love – freedom – it also should not be spoken in this case. Love and freedom are not scientific works. You look for love not in the right way and not in that place. But if you prepare the report for scientific-theoretical conference, that, probably, your doings will not go to waste.